Model research
Correlations
Sample: 292 completed games
Method: Pre-match metrics using only prior games, based on actual listed players for each completed 2018-2026 game.
Snapshot generated Sun 4 Oct 2026 11:55pm Perth
Players nudie run
No remaining regular-season fixtures were found for the current round.
Final Three Rounds: 2023-2025 Score and Margin Check
The final three completed regular-season rounds in each expansion-era season are compared with that season's earlier rounds. Finals are excluded.
| Season | Late games | Late avg total | Earlier avg total | Total change | Late avg margin | Close games | 13+ margins | Home wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 15 | 44.1 | 39.9 | +4.3 | 20.9 | 13.3% | 66.7% | 46.7% |
| 2024 | 15 | 43.1 | 37.9 | +5.2 | 13.5 | 46.7% | 33.3% | 40.0% |
| 2025 | 18 | 43.4 | 38.0 | +5.3 | 20.3 | 22.2% | 55.6% | 77.8% |
| Pooled | 48 | 43.5 | 38.5 | +5.0 | 18.4 | 27.1% | 52.1% | 56.3% |
Final Three Rounds: Favourite Results
Favourite means the shorter stored pre-match head-to-head price. Matches without both prices are excluded, and sample coverage is shown so missing historical odds cannot be mistaken for a result.
| Season | Priced games | Favourite wins | Won by 13+ | Average favourite margin | Read |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0 of 15 | – | – | – | No stored two-sided prices |
| 2024 | 0 of 15 | – | – | – | No stored two-sided prices |
| 2025 | 0 of 18 | – | – | – | No stored two-sided prices |
| Pooled late | 0 of 48 | – | – | – | Use only with coverage shown |
| Earlier rounds | 0 of 108 | – | – | – | Same-season baseline |
Form favourite proxy where bookmaker prices are missing
This proxy selects the team higher on pre-match season win rate, using points difference per game only as a tie-break. Both teams must have played at least three games. It is a reproducible strength indicator, not a claim about the historical betting market.
| Season | Eligible late games | Form favourite wins | Won by 13+ | Average favourite margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 15 | 86.7% | 60.0% | 17.7 |
| 2024 | 15 | 53.3% | 26.7% | 4.7 |
| 2025 | 18 | 88.9% | 55.6% | 18.3 |
| Pooled late | 48 | 77.1% | 47.9% | 13.9 |
| Earlier rounds | 59 | 71.2% | 45.8% | 7.7 |
Final Three Rounds: Backs, Forwards and Multi-Try Games
Backs are jerseys 1-7 and forwards are jerseys 8-17, with recorded position used only when a jersey is unavailable. Double incidence is the share of matches containing at least one player with two or more tries.
| Season | Back tries | Forward tries | Back share | Players with 2+ | Matches with 2+ | Players with 3+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 78 | 43 | 64.5% | 16 | 10 | 2 |
| 2024 | 76 | 45 | 62.8% | 17 | 9 | 1 |
| 2025 | 102 | 44 | 69.9% | 25 | 17 | 6 |
| Pooled late | 256 | 132 | 66.0% | 58 | 36 (75.0%) | 9 |
| Earlier rounds | 534 | 256 | 67.6% | 115 | 74 (68.5%) | 16 |
Final Three Rounds: Repeatable Angles for the Coming Season
These are historical associations, not guarantees. A pattern is more useful when it repeats by season and still has a meaningful pooled difference from earlier rounds.
| Angle | Final-three result | Earlier-round baseline | Difference | Practical use |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Game totals | 43.5 | 38.5 | +5.0 | Use as a late-season total adjustment only if the current season is tracking the same direction. |
| 13+ margins | 52.1% | 57.4% | -5.3 pp | Do not assume every favourite wins big – price margin markets from the observed rate. |
| Close games, 6 or fewer | 27.1% | 28.7% | -1.6 pp | Useful counterweight to broad blowout narratives. |
| Matches with a double | 75.0% | 68.5% | +6.5 pp | Lift 2+ try attention only when player price, role and matchup also support it. |
| Back share of known-position tries | 66.0% | 67.6% | -1.6 pp | Use to tilt scorer shortlists between edge backs and forwards, not as a standalone bet. |
| Home wins | 56.3% | 46.3% | +10.0 pp | Keep venue in the model, but do not substitute home status for team strength. |
| Winner reached 24 points | 72.9% | 58.3% | +14.6 pp | Useful for same-game team-total and winning-margin scenarios. |
Method note: 48 possible late-window matches are expected across 2023-2025 when all results are present – 15 in 2023, 15 in 2024 and 18 in 2025. The live table reports the actual imported count.
High-Signal Repeated Patterns
| Pattern | Games | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Close games | 292 | finished within 6 points | 28.4% were decided by 6 or fewer. |
| Roosters | 69 | won | Roosters won 73.9% of stored games. |
| Broncos | 68 | won | Broncos won 75.0% of stored games. |
| Dragons | 63 | won | Dragons won 33.3% of stored games. |
| Knights | 57 | won | Knights won 61.4% of stored games. |
| Kickoff: Twilight | 54 | home side won | Home side won 57.4%. Avg total 40.4. |
| Eels | 52 | won | Eels won 36.5% of stored games. |
| Raiders | 42 | won | Raiders won 42.9% of stored games. |
| Cowboys | 41 | won | Cowboys won 39.0% of stored games. |
| Wests Tigers | 41 | won | Wests Tigers won 29.3% of stored games. |
| Venue: McDonald Jones Stadium | 35 | home side won | Home side won 60.0%. Avg total 40.1. |
| Warriors | 31 | won | Warriors won 38.7% of stored games. |
| Venue: Cbus Super Stadium | 23 | home side won | Home side won 60.9%. Avg total 38.5. |
| Venue: CommBank Stadium | 22 | home side won | Home side won 31.8%. Avg total 42.8. |
| Venue: GIO Stadium | 22 | home side won | Home side won 36.4%. Avg total 43.8. |
| Bulldogs | 22 | won | Bulldogs won 31.8% of stored games. |
| Venue: Allianz Stadium | 20 | home side won | Home side won 80.0%. Avg total 39.6. |
| Venue: Queensland Country Bank Stadium | 20 | home side won | Home side won 40.0%. Avg total 44.9. |
| Venue: Queensland Country Bank Stadium | 20 | higher totals | Avg total 44.9 vs league 40.0. |
| Kickoff: Night | 18 | home side won | Home side won 44.4%. Avg total 33.6. |
| Kickoff: Night | 18 | lower totals | Avg total 33.6 vs league 40.0. |
| Venue: Accor Stadium | 18 | home side won | Home side won 61.1%. Avg total 38.2. |
| Venue: Totally Workwear Stadium | 15 | home side won | Home side won 86.7%. Avg total 46.0. |
| Venue: Totally Workwear Stadium | 15 | higher totals | Avg total 46.0 vs league 40.0. |
| Referee: B. Sharpe | 13 | home side won | Home side won 30.8%. Avg total 43.4. |
| Venue: WIN Stadium | 13 | home side won | Home side won 30.8%. Avg total 36.4. |
| Venue: Suncorp Stadium | 11 | home side won | Home side won 63.6%. Avg total 38.5. |
| Venue: Leichhardt Oval | 10 | home side won | Home side won 30.0%. Avg total 40.8. |
| Broncos v Dragons | 10 | Broncos won | Broncos won 90.0% of this matchup. |
| Dragons v Roosters | 10 | Roosters won | Roosters won 80.0% of this matchup. |
Kickoff Time
| Group | Games | Home Win | Avg Total | Avg Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day | 220 | 47.7% | 40.4 | 16.1 |
| Twilight | 54 | 57.4% | 40.4 | 18.7 |
| Night | 18 | 44.4% | 33.6 | 11.2 |
Referees
| Group | Games | Home Win | Avg Total | Avg Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. Sharpe | 13 | 30.8% | 43.4 | 25.2 |
| K. Badger | 10 | 50.0% | 39.8 | 11.8 |
| T. Wilkie | 8 | 50.0% | 49.6 | 14.6 |
| R. Tamarua | 7 | 28.6% | 46.4 | 15.6 |
| P. Gough | 5 | 40.0% | 51.6 | 25.2 |
| E. Klein | 5 | 20.0% | 41.0 | 11.4 |
| K. Nolan | 5 | 60.0% | 47.8 | 15.0 |
| L. Kennedy | 4 | 25.0% | 34.5 | 22.5 |
| Z. Przeklasa-Adamski | 4 | 100.0% | 37.0 | 10.0 |
| J. Eaton | 3 | 66.7% | 56.0 | 34.7 |
Venues
| Group | Games | Home Win | Avg Total | Avg Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| McDonald Jones Stadium | 35 | 60.0% | 40.1 | 12.9 |
| Cbus Super Stadium | 23 | 60.9% | 38.5 | 16.6 |
| CommBank Stadium | 22 | 31.8% | 42.8 | 17.0 |
| GIO Stadium | 22 | 36.4% | 43.8 | 16.0 |
| Allianz Stadium | 20 | 80.0% | 39.6 | 17.4 |
| Queensland Country Bank Stadium | 20 | 40.0% | 44.9 | 20.5 |
| Accor Stadium | 18 | 61.1% | 38.2 | 13.1 |
| Totally Workwear Stadium | 15 | 86.7% | 46.0 | 23.6 |
| WIN Stadium | 13 | 30.8% | 36.4 | 15.8 |
| Suncorp Stadium | 11 | 63.6% | 38.5 | 22.9 |
| Leichhardt Oval | 10 | 30.0% | 40.8 | 15.6 |
| PointsBet Stadium | 8 | 50.0% | 29.3 | 13.3 |
| Campbelltown Sports Stadium | 7 | 14.3% | 36.9 | 22.6 |
| Go Media Stadium | 6 | 33.3% | 39.0 | 15.7 |
| Netstrata Jubilee Stadium | 6 | 50.0% | 47.5 | 12.2 |
| Industree Group Stadium | 6 | 50.0% | 41.7 | 20.3 |
| Geohex Park | 6 | 0.0% | 41.3 | 16.0 |
| AAMI Park | 5 | 60.0% | 32.2 | 9.8 |
| Belmore Sports Ground | 5 | 40.0% | 49.4 | 19.8 |
| Sharks Stadium | 5 | 60.0% | 31.4 | 2.6 |
Teams
| Group | Games | Home Win | Avg Total | Avg Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Broncos | 68 | 75.0% win rate | 42.6 | 13.5 |
| Roosters | 69 | 73.9% win rate | 39.8 | 12.8 |
| Knights | 57 | 61.4% win rate | 40.8 | 6.1 |
| Titans | 55 | 54.5% win rate | 36.7 | 0.9 |
| Sharks | 43 | 46.5% win rate | 38.0 | 0.2 |
| Raiders | 42 | 42.9% win rate | 41.9 | -2.3 |
| Cowboys | 41 | 39.0% win rate | 41.7 | -9.9 |
| Warriors | 31 | 38.7% win rate | 39.2 | -4.1 |
| Eels | 52 | 36.5% win rate | 40.9 | -8.4 |
| Dragons | 63 | 33.3% win rate | 37.1 | -6.0 |
| Bulldogs | 22 | 31.8% win rate | 46.4 | -15.8 |
| Wests Tigers | 41 | 29.3% win rate | 38.5 | -10.0 |
Head to Head
| Group | Games | Home Win | Avg Total | Avg Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Broncos v Roosters | 13 | Broncos 53.8% | 38.2 | 12.9 |
| Broncos v Dragons | 10 | Broncos 90.0% | 37.9 | 17.5 |
| Dragons v Roosters | 10 | Roosters 80.0% | 32.0 | 18.8 |
| Broncos v Knights | 9 | Broncos 66.7% | 48.0 | 16.4 |
| Knights v Titans | 8 | Knights 75.0% | 42.3 | 11.8 |
| Dragons v Titans | 7 | Titans 57.1% | 35.3 | 10.1 |
| Eels v Knights | 7 | Knights 85.7% | 39.6 | 17.3 |
| Roosters v Titans | 7 | Roosters 57.1% | 35.7 | 18.6 |
| Broncos v Titans | 7 | Broncos 57.1% | 40.7 | 17.3 |
| Eels v Roosters | 7 | Roosters 85.7% | 50.4 | 24.1 |
| Dragons v Knights | 7 | Knights 71.4% | 40.6 | 21.7 |
| Dragons v Eels | 6 | Dragons 83.3% | 32.3 | 14.3 |
| Knights v Roosters | 6 | Roosters 66.7% | 31.0 | 9.0 |
| Eels v Titans | 6 | Titans 66.7% | 42.3 | 16.3 |
| Broncos v Eels | 6 | Broncos 66.7% | 41.3 | 22.7 |
| Roosters v Sharks | 6 | Roosters 100.0% | 45.8 | 21.2 |
| Roosters v Warriors | 5 | Roosters 60.0% | 37.2 | 20.4 |
| Dragons v Warriors | 5 | Dragons 80.0% | 36.0 | 11.2 |
| Broncos v Warriors | 5 | Broncos 80.0% | 40.8 | 18.4 |
| Raiders v Roosters | 5 | Roosters 80.0% | 40.4 | 10.0 |
Second-Half First Try: Repeat Players
Official Match Centre play-by-play only. This Correlations view uses a two-occurrence threshold; the Odds Comparison trend remains stricter at three.
| Player | Team | First second-half tries | Completed matches | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamika Upton | Broncos | 8 | 62 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Dragons |
| Julia Robinson | Broncos | 6 | 58 | First recorded try after half-time · 2 v Dragons |
| Madison Bartlett | Raiders | 6 | 40 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Eels |
| Teagan Berry | Dragons | 6 | 52 | First recorded try after half-time · 3 v Titans |
| Brydie Parker | Roosters | 5 | 52 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Sharks |
| Jaime Chapman | Titans | 5 | 47 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Warriors |
| Jessica Sergis | Roosters | 5 | 57 | First recorded try after half-time · 2 v Raiders |
| Kerri Johnson | Broncos | 5 | 25 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Eels |
| Lauren Brown | Titans | 5 | 57 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Warriors |
| Shanice Parker | Knights | 5 | 57 | First recorded try after half-time · 2 v Titans |
| Tarryn Aiken | Roosters | 5 | 55 | First recorded try after half-time · 2 v Broncos |
| Zahara Temara | Raiders | 5 | 65 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Wests Tigers |
| Jocelyn Kelleher | Roosters | 4 | 62 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Titans |
| Mele Hufanga | Warriors | 4 | 39 | First recorded try after half-time |
| Monica Tagoai | Bulldogs | 4 | 18 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Knights |
| Rachael Pearson | Eels | 4 | 48 | First recorded try after half-time · 2 v Sharks |
| Shaylee Bent | Wests Tigers | 4 | 63 | First recorded try after half-time |
| Sheridan Gallagher | Raiders | 4 | 44 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Eels |
| Tayla Predebon | Knights | 4 | 55 | First recorded try after half-time · 2 v Eels |
| Tysha Ikenasio | Warriors | 4 | 18 | First recorded try after half-time · 2 v Bulldogs |
| Abigail Roache | Cowboys | 3 | 38 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Raiders |
| Ali Brigginshaw | Broncos | 3 | 65 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Raiders |
| Cassie Staples | Sharks | 3 | 42 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Dragons |
| Chelsea Lenarduzzi | Broncos | 3 | 67 | First recorded try after half-time · 2 v Warriors |
| Elsie Albert | Eels | 3 | 46 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Knights |
| Evania Isa'ako | Titans | 3 | 45 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Broncos |
| Jada Taylor | Sharks | 3 | 26 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Roosters |
| Kimberley Hunt | Dragons | 3 | 12 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Knights |
| Meg Ward | Broncos | 3 | 10 | First recorded try after half-time · 2 v Roosters |
| Tiana Penitani Gray | Sharks | 3 | 56 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Roosters |
| China Polata | Sharks | 2 | 32 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Dragons |
| Corban Baxter | Roosters | 2 | 43 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Sharks |
| Elise Simpson | Raiders | 2 | 18 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Bulldogs |
| Elizabeth MacGregor | Bulldogs | 2 | 17 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Sharks |
| Emily Bass | Wests Tigers | 2 | 35 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Bulldogs |
| Emma Verran | Sharks | 2 | 42 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Warriors |
| Fane Finau | Knights | 2 | 16 | First recorded try after half-time · 2 v Titans |
| Faythe Manera | Wests Tigers | 2 | 21 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Bulldogs |
| Georgia Grey | Titans | 2 | 29 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Raiders |
| Georgia Hannaway | Sharks | 2 | 29 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Raiders |
| Jasmine Peters | Cowboys | 2 | 49 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Wests Tigers |
| Jayme Fressard | Roosters | 2 | 45 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Dragons |
| Jordyn Preston | Raiders | 2 | 26 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Roosters |
| Kody House | Dragons | 2 | 7 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Roosters |
| Lavinia Tauhalaliku | Warriors | 2 | 12 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Dragons |
| Mackenzie Wiki | Raiders | 2 | 36 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Warriors |
| Ma’atuleio Fotu-Moala | Bulldogs | 2 | 30 | First recorded try after half-time |
| Otesa Pule | Roosters | 2 | 51 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Cowboys |
| Payton Takimoana | Warriors | 2 | 19 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Cowboys |
| Raecene McGregor | Wests Tigers | 2 | 60 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Sharks |
| Rosemarie Beckett | Eels | 2 | 21 | First recorded try after half-time · 2 v Cowboys |
| Ruby-Jean Kennard-Ellis | Dragons | 2 | 30 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Cowboys |
| Salma Nour | Wests Tigers | 2 | 29 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Raiders |
| Sariah Paki | Roosters | 2 | 12 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Eels |
| Shakiah Tungai | Raiders | 2 | 28 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Broncos |
| Shenae Ciesiolka | Dragons | 2 | 49 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Broncos |
| Sienna Lofipo | Titans | 2 | 37 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Sharks |
| Simina Lokotui | Bulldogs | 2 | 17 | First recorded try after half-time · 1 v Cowboys |
| Tayla Preston | Bulldogs | 2 | 47 | First recorded try after half-time |
Experience Metrics
| Question | Correlation | Read |
|---|---|---|
| Avg GP difference vs margin | 0.549 | Strong |
| Games Together difference vs margin | 0.532 | Strong |
| Avg 6/7 difference vs margin | 0.295 | Weak |
| Avg GP difference vs home win | 0.415 | Moderate |
| Games Together difference vs home win | 0.402 | Moderate |
| Avg 6/7 difference vs home win | 0.228 | Weak |
| Average combined Avg GP vs game total | 0.282 | Weak |
| Average combined Together vs game total | 0.294 | Weak |
| Average combined Avg 6/7 vs game total | 0.243 | Weak |
| Avg GP gap vs absolute margin | 0.312 | Moderate |
| Games Together gap vs absolute margin | 0.297 | Weak |
| Avg 6/7 gap vs absolute margin | 0.209 | Weak |
| Higher Metric Side | Games | Win Rate | Avg Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avg GP | 289 | 67.1% | 8.61 |
| Games Together | 286 | 68.5% | 8.87 |
| Avg 6/7 | 230 | 60.0% | 5.33 |
Birthday Scoring Watch
Uses every completed appearance in the imported 2018-2026 history for players with a matched date of birth. Exact-day and nearby-weekend appearances are separate, non-overlapping groups.
Birthday-on-game-day: 7 scored in 32 appearances where a player played on her actual birthday (across 30 players with enough other games to compare) – scoring rate 21.9% vs their own normal rate 19.6%.
Birthday-on-game-weekend (birthday within 2 days of the match, excluding exact-day games already counted above): 22 scored in 96 appearances (across 72 players) – scoring rate 22.9% vs their own normal rate 15.7%.
10-team era comparison
The 2023-onward column includes only appearances and comparison games from the 10-team era.
| Test | 2018-2026 sample | 2018-2026 rate | 2023 onward sample | 2023 onward rate | Change | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scored on actual birthday | 32 | 21.9% | 23 | 21.7% | -0.1 pp | Little change |
| Matched normal rate for actual-birthday players | 32 | 19.6% | 23 | 17.9% | -1.7 pp | Little change |
| Scored during birthday weekend | 96 | 22.9% | 83 | 20.5% | -2.4 pp | Little change |
| Matched normal rate for birthday-weekend players | 96 | 15.7% | 83 | 15.9% | +0.2 pp | Little change |
2023-onward birthday read: actual-birthday scoring was 3.8 percentage points versus the matched normal rate. Nearby-weekend scoring was 4.6 points versus normal.
Career milestone comparisons
| Milestone | Games at milestone | Scoring rate AT milestone | Their own rate otherwise | Read |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career game #50 | 39 | 20.5% | 22.4% | See rate comparison |
| Career game #75 | 0 | – | – | Too few instances to conclude anything (n=0) |
| 1-3 tries short of 25 (career) | 51 | 52.9% | 45.7% | See rate comparison |
| 1-3 tries short of 50 (career) | 1 | 100.0% | 65.6% | Small sample (1 players have ever been in this window) – suggestive at best |
| 1-3 tries short of 100 (career) | 0 | – | – | Small sample (0 players have ever been in this window) – suggestive at best |
Method note: each rate is compared against that same player’s own scoring rate in their other games, not the league average – a raw league-average comparison would be misleading here, since only the competition’s best finishers ever get near a tries milestone at all, and they naturally score more often regardless of any “milestone effect.”
50th Match Back-Test
This tests the exact sequence behind the Milestone Girls question: a try in career appearance 49, followed by the player’s scoring result in career appearance 50. “Game 49” means the previous recorded appearance, which is not necessarily seven days earlier.
History covered: all completed player appearances in the imported database from 2018-2026. This begins with the inaugural 2018 NRLW season – it is not limited to expansion seasons. The 50-game sample is naturally weighted toward recent seasons because players could only reach that milestone after accumulating enough appearances.
| Cohort | Players | Scored in game 50 | Game-50 scoring rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scored in game 49 | 5 | 2 | 40.0% |
| Did not score in game 49 | 34 | 6 | 17.6% |
Back-test result: 3 of the 5 players who scored in game 49 did not score in game 50.
10-team era comparison
Career appearance numbers still include pre-2023 games. The 2023-onward sample requires both Game 49 and Game 50 to have occurred during the 10-team era.
| Test | 2018-2026 sample | 2018-2026 rate | 2023 onward sample | 2023 onward rate | Change | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Game-50 scoring after scoring in Game 49 | 5 | 40.0% | 5 | 40.0% | +0.0 pp | Little change |
| Game-50 scoring after no try in Game 49 | 34 | 17.6% | 34 | 17.6% | +0.0 pp | Little change |
2023-onward back-test result: 3 of the 5 players who scored in Game 49 did not score in Game 50.
| Player | Game 49 | Game 50 | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brydie Parker | 2026-08-29 05:15:00 · Roosters · 2 tries | 2026-09-05 05:15:00 · Roosters · 0 tries | Scored in 49, not 50 |
| Teagan Berry | 2026-08-22 07:15:00 · Dragons · 1 try | 2026-08-30 01:45:00 · Dragons · 0 tries | Scored in 49, not 50 |
| Jessica Sergis | 2026-07-26 08:15:00 · Roosters · 1 try | 2026-08-01 03:25:00 · Roosters · 3 tries | Scored in both |
| Sarah Togatuki | 2026-07-19 03:45:00 · Wests Tigers · 1 try | 2026-07-26 08:15:00 · Wests Tigers · 0 tries | Scored in 49, not 50 |
| Tamika Upton | 2025-10-05 05:00:00 · Broncos · 1 try | 2026-07-04 07:15:00 · Broncos · 1 try | Scored in both |
| Shenae Ciesiolka | 2026-09-12 07:10:00 · Dragons · 1 try | Awaiting recorded game 50 | Pending 50th |
Interpretation note: this is a historical conditional rate, not a rule that an individual player will or will not score. Pending players are listed for tracking but excluded from the completed game-50 rates.
50th Match Milestone Test
This asks whether scoring is unusually concentrated in career appearance 50. It includes every player with completed appearances 49, 50 and 51, then compares Game 50 with the neighbouring games and that player group’s Games 40-48 baseline.
| Appearance window | Observations | Scored | Scoring rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Career Game 49 | 38 | 5 | 13.2% |
| Career Game 50 | 38 | 8 | 21.1% |
| Career Game 51 | 38 | 5 | 13.2% |
| Games 40-48 baseline | 342 | 81 | 23.7% |
Exact-50 comparison: +7.9 pp versus the average of Games 49 and 51, and -2.6 pp versus Games 40-48.
Paired player check: Game 50 beat Game 49 for 6 players, while Game 49 beat Game 50 for 3. Game 50 beat Game 51 for 7, while Game 51 beat Game 50 for 4.
10-team era comparison
The 2023-onward cohort requires actual career Games 49, 50 and 51 to all occur during the 10-team era. Its Games 40-48 baseline also excludes pre-2023 appearances.
| Test | 2018-2026 sample | 2018-2026 rate | 2023 onward sample | 2023 onward rate | Change | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scored in Career Game 49 | 38 | 13.2% | 38 | 13.2% | +0.0 pp | Little change |
| Scored in Career Game 50 | 38 | 21.1% | 38 | 21.1% | +0.0 pp | Little change |
| Scored in Career Game 51 | 38 | 13.2% | 38 | 13.2% | +0.0 pp | Little change |
| Scored in Games 40-48 baseline | 342 | 23.7% | 342 | 23.7% | +0.0 pp | Little change |
2023-onward exact-50 comparison: 7.9 percentage points versus Games 49 and 51, and -2.6 points versus Games 40-48.
Interpretation note: with 38 eligible players, this is descriptive evidence only. A higher Game-50 rate would be consistent with a milestone effect, but it cannot prove the milestone caused the try.
50th Match Tryscorer Fade Test
This tests the betting question directly: is career Game 50 a historically poor time to back a player as an anytime tryscorer? It does not assume the milestone causes the result.
| Appearance window | Observations | No try | No-try rate | ATTS rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All recorded Career Game 50s | 39 | 31 | 79.5% | 20.5% |
| Career Game 49 – balanced cohort | 38 | 33 | 86.8% | 13.2% |
| Career Game 50 – balanced cohort | 38 | 30 | 78.9% | 21.1% |
| Career Game 51 – balanced cohort | 38 | 33 | 86.8% | 13.2% |
| Games 40-48 – balanced cohort | 342 | 261 | 76.3% | 23.7% |
10-team era comparison
The mature-era rates preserve true career milestones but include only qualifying appearances from 2023 onward.
| Test | 2018-2026 sample | 2018-2026 rate | 2023 onward sample | 2023 onward rate | Change | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No try in all recorded Career Game 50s | 39 | 79.5% | 39 | 79.5% | +0.0 pp | Little change |
| No try in Career Game 49 – balanced cohort | 38 | 86.8% | 38 | 86.8% | +0.0 pp | Little change |
| No try in Career Game 50 – balanced cohort | 38 | 78.9% | 38 | 78.9% | +0.0 pp | Little change |
| No try in Career Game 51 – balanced cohort | 38 | 86.8% | 38 | 86.8% | +0.0 pp | Little change |
| No try in Games 40-48 – balanced cohort | 342 | 76.3% | 342 | 76.3% | +0.0 pp | Little change |
2023-onward fade read: Game 50 had a 78.9% no-try rate – -7.9 percentage points above Games 49 and 51, and 2.6 points above Games 40-48.
Historical fade result: across every completed 50th appearance, 31 of 39 players did not score (79.5%). In the balanced cohort that also completed Games 49 and 51, Game 50 produced no try for 30 of 38 players (78.9%). That was -7.9 percentage points above Games 49 and 51 combined, and 2.6 points above Games 40-48.
Betting read: among these tested windows, Game 50 has the highest historical no-try rate and the lowest ATTS strike rate. That supports downgrading or avoiding a milestone player in ATTS markets. It does not establish a profitable no-try bet at every price – the sample is only 38 players and value still depends on the odds. The raw Game-50 rate implies a no-try break-even price of about 1.27 before bookmaker margin.
Tryscorer Momentum vs Mean Reversion
Completed appearances only. Raw next-game rates show what happened after the condition; the player-adjusted effect compares the result with that player’s own scoring rate known before the game (minimum five prior appearances). This stops established tryscorers from making every “hot” group look predictive simply because they are better finishers.
| Previous form condition | Condition games | Raw next-game scoring | Other games | Raw scoring otherwise | Player-adjusted effect | Read |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scored in previous appearance | 1514 | 28.3% | 6583 | 16.5% | -4.7 pp | Historical mean reversion |
| Scored in either previous two | 2603 | 26.0% | 5494 | 15.2% | -6.2 pp | Historical mean reversion |
| Scored in both previous two | 419 | 39.4% | 7678 | 17.5% | -4.5 pp | Historical mean reversion |
| Scored 2+ tries in previous appearance | 275 | 38.2% | 7822 | 18.0% | -0.8 pp | Little player-adjusted effect |
| Ran 100m+ in previous appearance | 2454 | 25.5% | 5643 | 15.7% | +0.7 pp | Little player-adjusted effect |
Model note: a negative adjusted effect is evidence of historical mean reversion, not proof that a particular scorer is “due to miss.” These are monitoring features and should be validated against locked prices before affecting stakes.
Prop Scoring: 2023 Expansion Check
This updates game by game from completed Match Centre player stats. It tests the broad prop-scoring era split, then highlights the specific props and opposition profiles that may matter more than the league-wide rate.
Overall prop scoring
| Era | Prop apps | Scored apps | Score rate | Matches with prop try |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-2022 | 228 | 35 | 15.4% | 50.9% |
| 2023 onward | 940 | 108 | 11.5% | 37.4% |
Read: The broad "props score more post-expansion" idea is not supported overall; use the specific player and opposition rows below instead.
Top prop scorers, 2023 onward
| Player | Prop games | Games scored | Tries | Score rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ellie Johnston | 42 | 13 | 14 | 31.0% |
| Elsie Albert | 31 | 6 | 8 | 19.4% |
| Sophie Holyman | 42 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% |
| Rima Butler | 23 | 6 | 7 | 26.1% |
| Tayla Predebon | 33 | 5 | 7 | 15.2% |
| Sarah Togatuki | 39 | 5 | 5 | 12.8% |
| Millie Elliott | 27 | 5 | 5 | 18.5% |
| Otesa Pule | 30 | 4 | 5 | 13.3% |
| Brianna Clark | 36 | 4 | 4 | 11.1% |
| Jessika Elliston | 32 | 4 | 4 | 12.5% |
Teams conceding prop tries most often, 2023 onward
| Opponent | Games | Games conceded prop try | Rate | Prop tries conceded |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bulldogs | 22 | 9 | 40.9% | 15 |
| Eels | 40 | 15 | 37.5% | 17 |
| Cowboys | 41 | 13 | 31.7% | 13 |
| Dragons | 40 | 12 | 30.0% | 14 |
| Knights | 45 | 11 | 24.4% | 14 |
| Broncos | 45 | 11 | 24.4% | 11 |
| Raiders | 42 | 8 | 19.0% | 10 |
| Sharks | 43 | 8 | 18.6% | 8 |
| Warriors | 22 | 3 | 13.6% | 3 |
| Wests Tigers | 41 | 4 | 9.8% | 4 |
| Titans | 44 | 4 | 9.1% | 6 |
| Roosters | 45 | 4 | 8.9% | 4 |
Method note: prop rows use appeared players whose Match Centre position is Prop. Opponent games count each completed team-match from 2023 onward, while conceded prop tries count tries scored by opposition props in those games.